{"id":67,"date":"2022-01-20T13:49:38","date_gmt":"2022-01-20T18:49:38","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/queerrhetoricssp22.erinmandersen.com\/?p=67"},"modified":"2022-01-27T07:13:17","modified_gmt":"2022-01-27T12:13:17","slug":"thurs-1-20","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/queerrhetoricssp22.erinmandersen.com\/?p=67","title":{"rendered":"Thurs. 1\/20"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On Tuesday, I mentioned that I&#8217;d be asking you to take a look at some speeches from early LGBTQ+ rights activists, but I think I&#8217;ll set that aside for our work together next week. (I know the Sedgwick reading is a bit dense so I don&#8217;t want to assign more reading on top of that for you today.) Instead, I have a few synthesizing questions I&#8217;d like you to discuss in small groups on Moodle to build connections between Foucault and Sedgwick:<\/p>\n<p>Both Foucault and Sedgwick are laying out hypotheses in their books. Foucault&#8217;s focuses on the production of sexuality in society, while Sedgwick&#8217;s focuses more specifically on the binary of homosexual vs heterosexual desire in Western history and culture. In the chapter we&#8217;ve read, Sedgwick lays out axioms or truths as a groundwork for the tests she puts <span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">to\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">her hypothesis later in the book in the chapters we won&#8217;t be reading this semester. (I highly recommend reading at least chapter one, &#8220;Epistemology of the Closet,&#8221; if you&#8217;re interested in reading more queer theory after this class, as it&#8217;s essential &#8211; it was just a bit too long for me to assign on top of &#8220;Axioms.&#8221;) As I mentioned in some of my introductory comments, Sedgwick&#8217;s axioms seems rather simplistic on the surface, but are more complex than they seem. <\/span>For our discussion board post today, I&#8217;d like you and your group to think about a particular axiom in the context of today&#8217;s views of sexuality as well as what we learned from Foucault. Do we think the axiom itself holds up? Do we think Sedgwick&#8217;s 1990 explanation of the axiom holds up, or have circumstances changed even if the axiom hasn&#8217;t? Is it still a &#8220;truth,&#8221; or do we think that&#8217;s too lofty a term for it? If you&#8217;re not sure, explain some of the questions you have or your thinking behind your lack of surety. (It&#8217;s okay not to have a definitive answer. \ud83d\ude42 ) I have some guidelines for <a href=\"https:\/\/queerrhetoricssp22.erinmandersen.com\/?page_id=22\">my expectations for discussion board posts here,<\/a> just FYI.<\/p>\n<p>Axiom #2 Group: Kayla, Kora,\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Charlie, <\/span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Danielle<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Axiom #3 Group:\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Michaela, Jake,\u00a0<\/span><span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Dana<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Axiom #4 Group:\u00a0<span style=\"font-size: 1rem;\">Teryn, Izabelle, Kristi, Ryan<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Axiom #5 Group: Ken, Dean, Maria<\/p>\n<p>Axiom #7 Group: Maya, Cora, Ashlee<\/p>\n<p>Since I&#8217;m posting this so late, your responses won&#8217;t be due until Saturday.<\/p>\n<p>Remember that for Tuesday, we&#8217;ll be reading the first half of James Baldwin&#8217;s <em>Giovanni&#8217;s Room<\/em>. See you on campus in Seay 301! \ud83d\ude42<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On Tuesday, I mentioned that I&#8217;d be asking you to take a look at some speeches from early LGBTQ+ rights activists, but I think I&#8217;ll set that aside for our work together next week. (I know the Sedgwick reading is a bit dense so I don&#8217;t want to assign more reading on top of that&hellip; <a class=\"more-link\" href=\"https:\/\/queerrhetoricssp22.erinmandersen.com\/?p=67\">Continue reading &rarr;<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[3],"tags":[19,18,7,16,17,13,6],"class_list":["post-67","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-assignments","tag-1-20","tag-axioms","tag-january","tag-january-20th","tag-sedgwick","tag-theorists","tag-thursday"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/queerrhetoricssp22.erinmandersen.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/queerrhetoricssp22.erinmandersen.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/queerrhetoricssp22.erinmandersen.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/queerrhetoricssp22.erinmandersen.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/queerrhetoricssp22.erinmandersen.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=67"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/queerrhetoricssp22.erinmandersen.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":73,"href":"https:\/\/queerrhetoricssp22.erinmandersen.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/67\/revisions\/73"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/queerrhetoricssp22.erinmandersen.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=67"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/queerrhetoricssp22.erinmandersen.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=67"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/queerrhetoricssp22.erinmandersen.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=67"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}